Psychotherapy Research· S. S. Høgenhaug S. V. Steffensen M. T. Kongerslev M. F. Larsen A. E. Christensen G. Kjaersdam Telléus 1 Clinic North, Psychiatric Hospital, Bronderslev, Denmark2 Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark3 Danish Institute for Advanced Study, Odense, Denmark4 College of International Studies, Southwest University, Chongqing, People’s Republic of China5 Department for Culture and Language, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark6 Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark7 Mental Health Services West, Central and West Zealand Hospital, Region Zealand, Slagelse, Denmark8 Psychiatry, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark9 Psychology, Department of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark·· 2026-01-19AI 评分50
自然临床环境中破裂标记频率与修复策略使用及其与心理治疗结果的关系：人格障碍与焦虑障碍的比较研究
Frequencies of rupture markers and use of repair strategies and their relationship to psychotherapy outcomes in naturalistic clinical settings: A comparative study of personality disorders and anxiety disorders
AI 导读
一项自然临床设置研究对9例人格障碍和7例焦虑障碍治疗共392次录像会谈用破裂修复评定量表进行评定，发现两组在破裂标记频率和修复策略使用上无统计学显著差异。人格障碍组患者发起的对抗性破裂标记呈增多趋势，且患者发起的破裂标记频率越高，SCL-92中躯体化、焦虑、恐惧、偏执观念和精神病性五个分量表的症状严重度越高，但与总体严重度指数无关。
来源：Psychotherapy Research · tandfonline.com