研究发现心理化与情绪调节量表的构念名称与条目并不总对应

Psychology has a measurement problem: different constructs often share the same name, and the same construct is measured under different names. This matters most for constructs theorized as interdependent. In theory, these constructs are defined by name, and their interdependence is posited at that level; in practice, each is measured by a pool of items, often from separate questionnaires, which may overlap or diverge in ways the names do not anticipate. We asked whether construct names correspond to the items that operationalize them, whether items reflect the structure of responses, and whether responses follow the boundaries posited by names or drawn by items. Using reflective functioning, epistemic trust, and difficulties in emotion regulation as a case study, we compared semantic similarities of construct names and items with response correlations in 1,167 emerging adults (aged 18–29, 72% female; item-level analyses preregistered) and 1,068 secondary school students (aged 14–20, 67% female). Construct names best matched their own items in 4 of 11 subscales. Items reflected the structure of responses (r = .62 and .58), also, less closely, across questionnaires (.42 and .37). Responses followed boundaries drawn by items more than those posited by names. A correlation between such measures, usually read as evidence of interdependence, may also arise from items that describe the same experience or from shared method variance. What theory says about a construct thus applies only in part to what its items measure.