Psychology, Crime & Law· Alexa A. Mecikalski Jonathan M. Golding Jeffrey S. Neuschatz Jagger D. Rice a Department of Psychology, The University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL, USAb Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USAc School of Psychology, Fielding Graduate University, Santa Barbara, CA, USAd Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA·· 2026-03-09AI 评分20
HIV 潜在传播感知：民事法庭中的法律决策研究
Perceptions of the potential transmission of the human immune-deficiency virus (HIV): legal decision-making in civil court
AI 导读
一项研究让社区男女被试阅读 HIV 民事审判摘要，案中女性原告（清醒或醉酒状态下发生性行为）指控男性被告未在性行为前披露其 HIV 状态。结果发现，被试总体上更多做出有利于原告的判决；原告清醒时比醉酒时获得更多有利判决，且支持原告的评分在醉酒条件与案件判决之间起间接作用。被试支持原告的理由是被告有责任告知其 HIV 状态，支持被告的理由则是原告有责任保护自己免受性传播疾病暴露。
来源：Psychology, Crime & Law · tandfonline.com