跳到正文
原文
medRxiv 精神医学与临床心理· Ownby, R. L., Caballero, J., Thomas-Purcell, K. ·· 7 天前AI 评分26

基于TAM与TPB的10条目健康聊天机器人接受度量表(CAS)的开发与初步评估:一项试点研究

Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a Brief Health Chatbot Acceptability Scale (CAS): A Pilot Study

AI 导读

一项试点研究开发了基于TAM和TPB的10条目健康聊天机器人接受度量表(CAS),并在20名参与睡眠应用可用性研究的成年人(平均年龄52.8岁,85%为40岁及以上)中完成初步心理测量评估。探索性因子分析提取出信息质量与接受度两个因子,各条目在主因子上载荷均≥.60,两个分量表与SUS的相关分别为r=.69和r=.59。作者指出样本量小,结果仅为初步证据,该量表有待在更大独立样本中正式验证。

摘要

BackgroundConversational agents (chatbots) are increasingly used to deliver health information to middle-aged and older adults, a population in which the determinants of technology acceptance are known to diverge from those of younger users. However, acceptability is inconsistently defined and typically measured with ad hoc, unvalidated instruments. The psychometrically sound chatbot measures that exist assess usability rather than acceptability or were validated in student samples. ObjectiveTo develop and conduct an initial psychometric evaluation of a brief, 10-item health chatbot acceptance measure grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). MethodsTwenty adults (mean age = 52.8 years, range 28-81; 85% aged 40 or older; 75% female) enrolled in a sleep-application pilot usability study completed the 10 candidate items, the System Usability Scale (SUS), and sleep measures (PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 8a; Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index). We examined item performance, internal consistency (Cronbachs alpha), dimensionality (exploratory factor analysis with oblique rotation), and convergent validity (correlations with the SUS). ResultsA two-factor structure emerged and was invariant across rotation methods, resulting in an Information Quality factor and an Acceptance factor (interfactor r = .39). All items loaded [≥] .60 on their primary factor; mean communality was .83. Subscale reliabilities were high (Information Quality = .96; Acceptance = .94; full scale = .93). Both subscales correlated with the SUS in the expected direction (r = .69 and r = .59), providing preliminary support for convergent validity. ConclusionsThe measure shows a coherent and theory-consistent two-factor structure and shows preliminary evidence of reliability and convergent validity. Given the small pilot sample, these results must be viewed as provisional but identify the measure as a candidate for formal validation in a larger, independent sampl

DOI:10.64898/2026.11.05.26367380v1摘要来源:信源摘要

中文翻译还没有生成,先显示原文。

来源:medRxiv 精神医学与临床心理 · medrxiv.org